The Wildelings by Lisa Harding is a brilliantly constructed, psychologically incisive, and emotionally gripping literary novel set against the brooding backdrop of an elite university in Dublin. A visceral, voice-driven work that sits confidently in the Dark Academia genre, Harding’s latest offering examines the fragility of selfhood, the violence of influence, and the perils of power within friendship.
Building on her previous novels—Harvesting (published in the U.S. as Cloud Girls) and Bright Burning Things—Harding again explores the lives of women in extremis. But here, she takes a sharp turn into the intimate, seductive, and ultimately devastating terrain of intellectual power plays, performative identity, and psychological grooming.
Plot Summary: The Entangled Paths of Jessica, Linda, and Mark
The story opens with a present-day Jessica in therapy, emotionally dislocated and burdened by a past that refuses to stay buried. The narrative then flashes back to her late adolescence, to the prestigious Wilde University, where she and her childhood best friend Linda arrive eager to reinvent themselves. Their shared history is one of trauma and broken homes, but also mutual dependency—Jessica, the bold and magnetic one, and Linda, the quieter shadow who follows her lead.
Their dynamic is challenged by the entrance of Mark Whitman, a charismatic, manipulative philosophy student and aspiring playwright. Mark lures Linda into a controlling, increasingly cult-like relationship. As Jessica observes the change in Linda and Mark’s influence seeping into their entire friend circle, her sense of reality and control begins to crumble. The novel crescendos into betrayal, moral ambiguity, and a tragic event that alters all their lives forever.
Themes: Friendship, Power, and the Illusion of Autonomy
Harding masterfully dissects the idea of friendship as a sanctuary and then turns it into a weapon. Jessica and Linda’s bond is intense, at times obsessive, filled with unspoken dependencies and rivalries. The novel explores:
- Power dynamics in female friendships: Who leads, who follows, and what happens when that balance is disrupted.
- Charisma and control: Mark is not just a love interest but a philosophical predator, cloaking coercion in intellectual seduction.
- The search for identity: Jessica’s voice is sharply intelligent, self-aware yet vulnerable, continually grappling with what it means to be herself—or someone worthy of love and recognition.
This triad between Jessica, Linda, and Mark becomes a psychological theatre, exposing how easily the desire for meaning, intimacy, and self-expression can be hijacked by someone promising transcendence.
Character Analysis: Razor-Sharp Portraits in Emotional Flux
Jessica
Jessica, our narrator, is the emotional and intellectual core of the novel. She is fiercely self-aware, often unreliable, and deeply scarred by her father’s abandonment. Harding writes her with a voice that’s biting and brilliant, often caustic in tone, but tender in its underlying desperation. Jessica is the classic unreliable narrator, but her psychological depth is hauntingly real. Her later-life detachment and numbness become a chilling testament to the events of her youth.
Linda
Linda is quieter, more observant, and seemingly more pliable—but as the novel progresses, her complexity emerges. She is not just a victim of Jessica’s dominance or Mark’s manipulation, but someone actively searching for meaning in her own right. Her transformation under Mark’s influence is subtle and heartbreaking, culminating in devastating consequences that reflect the cost of psychological entrapment.
Mark
Mark is the quintessential Dark Academia male—erudite, dangerous, alluring. A manipulator cloaked in philosophical jargon, he uses ideas like honesty, truth-seeking, and authenticity as tools of control. His fixation on Shakespeare’s Jessica from The Merchant of Venice becomes a metaphorical anchor for his obsession with reinvention and rebellion, which he projects onto both Linda and Jessica.
Literary Style: Visceral, Evocative, and Cinematic
Harding’s writing is lush, poetic, and razor-edged. She expertly weaves dialogue and interior monologue into a tapestry that feels lived-in and raw. The cadence of her prose mirrors the emotional rhythm of her characters—taut, breathless, introspective. The sensory details are rich: Gothic architecture, whispered confidences, tactile costumes, and stormy Dublin streets all add to the immersive atmosphere.
The influence of The Dreamers is present, as the novel leans into a cinematic tone—claustrophobic college halls, candlelit rehearsals, and voyeuristic parties feel both alluring and suffocating. Harding turns Wilde University into a metaphor for both freedom and captivity, its cloistered glamour hiding a rot that infects all who enter.
Structure: A Three-Part Descent
The novel is divided into:
- The Beginning – Full of hope, allure, and promise. Jessica and Linda’s bond thrives here, even as fault lines begin to show.
- The Middle – Mark’s influence deepens, tensions mount, and a toxic brew of jealousy, dependency, and repression boils over.
- The End – The fallout. Tragedy strikes. The narrative catches up to the present, where guilt, trauma, and belated reckoning unfold.
The inclusion of a Coda—a mature Jessica returning to confront the ghosts of her past—lends the novel a sobering, redemptive tone, even if closure remains elusive.
Critical Appraisal: Strengths and Limitations
What Works Exceptionally Well
- Voice and interiority: Jessica’s narration is layered, self-reflexive, and often startlingly honest.
- The depiction of psychological grooming: Without veering into melodrama, Harding captures the slow, subtle encroachments of control—especially in how Mark draws Linda into his orbit.
- Atmosphere: The gothic academia setting is not just backdrop but thematic reinforcement. The dreamy, cerebral environment becomes a stage for emotional and moral breakdown.
What Could Be Improved
- Pacing in the middle: The narrative occasionally lingers too long in its atmospheric introspection, slowing the forward momentum. Some scenes, particularly those involving philosophical banter, feel repetitive in service of themes already well-established.
- Character overload: Secondary characters such as Jacques and Jonathan are well-drawn but underutilized. Their relationships to the central trio could have added more dimension had they been more tightly woven into the climax.
Still, these are minor critiques in a novel that otherwise holds its emotional center with authority.
Comparison with Similar Works
Readers who loved The Secret History by Donna Tartt or Bunny by Mona Awad will feel right at home with The Wildelings by Lisa Harding. Its exploration of elite intellectual circles, gendered power dynamics, and psychological disintegration places it squarely within that canon.
Lisa Harding’s Bright Burning Things was a powerful look at addiction and motherhood; Harvesting dealt with human trafficking and resilience. The Wildelings by Lisa Harding, in contrast, is more intimate but no less intense—a dark gem of female relationships and formative betrayals.
Final Verdict: A Chilling and Tender Triumph
The Wildelings by Lisa Harding is an unflinching exploration of identity, trauma, and betrayal dressed in the velvet and ink of Dark Academia. It is a cautionary tale about the seductions of charisma and the perils of abandoning the self for belonging. Harding’s greatest achievement is how she maps the landscape of young womanhood—not in simplistic binaries of strong or weak, right or wrong—but in all its chaotic yearning.
This is a novel to savor and be unsettled by, a book that lingers like the memory of a friendship that changed you—utterly, irrevocably.
